|
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 08:20:15 EST |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Organization: |
H. W. Wilson Company |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In general database searching, NEAR is usually defined as
operating within a 'sentence'. A 'sentence' usually ends with a
period, but in some databases, other characters can end a logical
sentence. For example in one system, words within parentheses
are searched as an independent 'sentence'. Does L-Soft have
symbols other than a period that end a logical sentence?
Dan Robinson
[log in to unmask]
On 26 Oct 00, at 3:37, Winship wrote:
> Since no one at L-SOFT has ventured to define NEAR for me, will this do?
> Unless I get something truly authoratative I'm going to go with it.
>.......... And I still don't like it that the implicit was changed
> from AND to NEAR. So I am writing my own comprehensive, list centric,
> item and is this an accurate description of the NEAR operand?
>
> ----
> For LISTSERV to consider two "words" to be NEAR they must be within a
> line of each other, with no more than five intervening "words."
> "Word" and "line" order are immaterial, but note that "line" is as
> defined by LISTSERV and may not match what you mean by "line" and
> "word" is as defined elsewhere in this document.
> (definition of "word" not included here)
> ----
>
> I would totally leave out mention of the NEAR comparative had it not been
> made the implicit over the AND operand.
>
>
> Douglas
|
|
|