On Dec 9,  4:46pm, Deborah Cresswell wrote:

} The problem is that when a post comes through to them and they hit REPLY
} to respond, this should (in theory) go back to the list and not the
} original sender!  This does not happen, their responses go back to the
} original sender and not the listname.
} I have set up the list header as...
}
} * REPLY-to= LISTNAME

I don't think thats a valid value for Reply-to=.  Try:

     * Reply-to= list,ignore

And look at the full headers of a post to see if a reply-to: is there,
and where its pointing to.  Does lotus notes generate a reply-to: in its
header?  The default for * Reply-to= is list, respect which means that
if a Reply-to: is in the header of an incoming message, it will be in
the outgoing message.  List,ignore says to put in a Reply-to: pointing
to the list no matter what was in the incoming message.

--
Rich Greenberg    Work:  PM0RMG atsign WSPVM1.worldspan.com   +1 770-563-6656
N6LRT   Marietta, GA, USA   Play: richgr atsign netcom.com    +1 770-321-6507
Eastern time.    I speak for myself & my dogs only.        VM'er since CP-67
Canines:Val(Chinook,CGC,TT),Red(Husky,(RIP)),Shasta(Husky,TT) Owner:Chinook-L
Atlanta Siberian Husky Rescue.  Adopt a homeless Husky.  Asst Owner:Sibernet-L