Wed, 9 Dec 1998 19:24:11 PST
|
On Dec 9, 4:46pm, Deborah Cresswell wrote:
} The problem is that when a post comes through to them and they hit REPLY
} to respond, this should (in theory) go back to the list and not the
} original sender! This does not happen, their responses go back to the
} original sender and not the listname.
} I have set up the list header as...
}
} * REPLY-to= LISTNAME
I don't think thats a valid value for Reply-to=. Try:
* Reply-to= list,ignore
And look at the full headers of a post to see if a reply-to: is there,
and where its pointing to. Does lotus notes generate a reply-to: in its
header? The default for * Reply-to= is list, respect which means that
if a Reply-to: is in the header of an incoming message, it will be in
the outgoing message. List,ignore says to put in a Reply-to: pointing
to the list no matter what was in the incoming message.
--
Rich Greenberg Work: PM0RMG atsign WSPVM1.worldspan.com +1 770-563-6656
N6LRT Marietta, GA, USA Play: richgr atsign netcom.com +1 770-321-6507
Eastern time. I speak for myself & my dogs only. VM'er since CP-67
Canines:Val(Chinook,CGC,TT),Red(Husky,(RIP)),Shasta(Husky,TT) Owner:Chinook-L
Atlanta Siberian Husky Rescue. Adopt a homeless Husky. Asst Owner:Sibernet-L
|
|
|