LSTOWN-L Archives

LISTSERV List Owners' Forum

LSTOWN-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Parts/Attachments: text/plain (22 lines)
Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Date:
Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:05:49 -0400
Reply-To:
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Stan Horwitz <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
On Mar 20, 2007, at 2:49 PM — 3/20/07, Gregory Hicks wrote:

>> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:38:49 -0500
>> From: Hal Keen <[log in to unmask]>
>>
> [...]
>>
>> I have delayed sending this while trying to come up with an  
>> example of a
>> two-address Reply-To: field, just to see if my own email client  
>> (Microsoft
>> Outlook Express) can understand it. So far, I have been unable to  
>> get OE to
>> send a well-formed two-address field in the first place.
>
> Not too surprising.  RFC-822 calls for only one address in the  
> Reply-to: header.

That gives rise to a question for the L-Soft people than. What's the  
point of "Reply-to= Both"?

Thanks for everyone's comments.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2