On Wed, 25 May 1994 13:21:36 EDT Wes Morgan <ENGR.UKY.EDU> wrote:
>
> For those of you performing preemptive filtering,
> here's the updated list of addresses from which the flood may come:
>
> [log in to unmask]
> [log in to unmask]
> [log in to unmask]
> [log in to unmask]
> [log in to unmask]
> [log in to unmask]
> [log in to unmask]
> [log in to unmask]
> [log in to unmask]
> [log in to unmask]
> *@pericles.com
> *@cybersell.pericles.com
Looking at the last two IDs above, I would use the single entry:
*@*PERICLES.COM
rather than those two IDs.
P.S. Has anybody **SUCCESSFULLY** "ping"-ed the host 'PERICLES.COM' ???
All I get is "host unreachable" from the nearest NSFNET gateway.
To me, that implies that IP packets cannot be routed to the host,
i.e., the host's IP-address is known, but it's totally inaccessible.
P.P.S. Can we terminate this discussion, until they *do* post something?
All this chatter is worse than any as-yet-imaginary offense. :-(