LSTOWN-L Archives

LISTSERV List Owners' Forum

LSTOWN-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Parts/Attachments: text/plain (34 lines)
Print Reply
Sender:
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Harold Pritchett <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Feb 1994 14:07:57 EST
In-Reply-To:
Message of Thu, 24 Feb 1994 09:50:16 CST from <ELSPAULA@MIZZOU1>
Reply-To:
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
On Thu, 24 Feb 1994 09:50:16 CST Paula Roper said:
>The other day someone sent a message about a list with about 900
>subscribers, indicating that it was a somewhat large list.  What
>would be considered a small, medium, large list?
 
I have a list with 9500 subscibers.  Based upon that, I would consider 900
to be at best medium to large.  I did a quick look at the list headers on
my listserv, and came up with the following numbers.
 
Total lists = 197
1000+           4
500 - 1000      6
250 -  500     20
100 -  250     33
 50 -  100     20
  1 -   50    104
 
>                                                  Wouldn't the focus
>of the group (more popular v more esoteric subject matter) have
>an impact on how large a group might be?
 
Absolutely!
 
>                                          Additionally, has a predictable
>rate of growth over time been noted in connection with these groups.
 
Yes.  Always up.
 
>Does anyone know of any literature that addresses these issues?
 
None that I know of.
 
Harold

ATOM RSS1 RSS2