|
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 24 Feb 1994 14:07:57 EST |
In-Reply-To: |
Message of Thu, 24 Feb 1994 09:50:16 CST from <ELSPAULA@MIZZOU1> |
Reply-To: |
|
On Thu, 24 Feb 1994 09:50:16 CST Paula Roper said:
>The other day someone sent a message about a list with about 900
>subscribers, indicating that it was a somewhat large list. What
>would be considered a small, medium, large list?
I have a list with 9500 subscibers. Based upon that, I would consider 900
to be at best medium to large. I did a quick look at the list headers on
my listserv, and came up with the following numbers.
Total lists = 197
1000+ 4
500 - 1000 6
250 - 500 20
100 - 250 33
50 - 100 20
1 - 50 104
> Wouldn't the focus
>of the group (more popular v more esoteric subject matter) have
>an impact on how large a group might be?
Absolutely!
> Additionally, has a predictable
>rate of growth over time been noted in connection with these groups.
Yes. Always up.
>Does anyone know of any literature that addresses these issues?
None that I know of.
Harold
|
|
|