On Tue, 18 Apr 1995 12:12:05 GMT <[log in to unmask]> said:
>D...\ I have  no objections  to the information  you have  made available.
>What I would like to say is, I would have prefered to know(as Administrator)
>that this project was under development.  D...\ I now have some additional
>work to do to ensure that each  owner of my lists realises that their list
>is available via the Web in this manner.
Security thorugh ignorance,  eh? As you say the information  has been there
as  well as  the means  to access  it. More  than a  year ago  I've written
something to  make this information  available via gopher. Didn't  warn the
administrators  though ...  more than  four  years ago  I complained  about
GLOBAL lists which either duplicated existing names without peering or were
clearly meant  for local purposes  and thus should  have been defined  in a
manner which would hide them from the world.
As LISTSERV administrator  I always made sure that  the owner(s) understand
the concept  of the Confidential,  Subscription, Review, and  Send keywords
and their effect.
 
Christian
P.S.: can't  speak how the  information is fetched by  TILE, all I  can say
that it is not as up-to-date as it could be, ie not more than 24 hours old.