> >   Would not
> >Filter= Also,*@*remarq.com
> >cover both  *@*.remarq.com  and  *@*remarq.com  ?
>
> Yes, but it also covers [log in to unmask] and so on.
> *@*.remarq.com,*@remarq.com has the virtue of blocking all remarq
> addresses and _nothing but_ remarq addresses.

A perhaps unlikely event but I get the discrimination.    Douglas