LSTOWN-L Archives

LISTSERV List Owners' Forum

LSTOWN-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Parts/Attachments: TEXT/PLAIN (18 lines)
Print Reply
Content-type:
TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Sender:
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Alperin, Glenn" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 1997 23:01:37 -0400
In-Reply-To:
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
>
>>At least my husband and I know who  to go after if I'm hit again and the
>>person who did it gets away again: This person and aol.
>
>In what way is AOL responsible for that? Or the company that provided the
>phone with which they called the thug?
>
>  Eric

The company that provides the phone could not easily be held liable
(although in the American court system, I suppose anything is possible)
because they have never been notified of the original problem.  If they
have been notified, and failed to do anything about ot, I think there
would be a strong case to argue that the phone company did not do its
proper job either, but from what I'm hearing, that is not likely here.

Glenn

ATOM RSS1 RSS2