|
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 May 2005 16:26:18 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
<p06230500beb10124f02a@[172.25.31.70]> |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Bill Verity wrote:
> As a site manager, I've suppressed a lot of mail with filters. Can I
> suppress the message about the blocked mail. Message sort of defeats my
> purpose of blocking the site. I do a serve off drop for individual
> addresses.
I'm not a site manager, but I know what he is talking about. I've reported
consistent spam addresses to my site manager, and he puts in a block,
but that just changes what *I* get from an item for approval to a list
error message. It doesn't reduce the *amount* of list administrative mail
I have to deal with, only the nature of it. This does not help.
Is there some way the site manager can put in a block without a report
being generated each time the block works, just drop the blocked garbage in
the bit bucket?
Douglas Winship [log in to unmask]
|
|
|