On 12 May 2003, at 16:38, Rich Greenberg wrote:

>On: Mon, May 12, 2003 at 01:38:06PM -0500,Chris Barnes Wrote:
>
>} Michael Quinion <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>} > Can anybody put my mind at rest on this?
>}
>} Here is the response I got from the folks at Earthlink:
>} * *
>} are permanently approved. Just make sure to keep sending your mailing
>} list from the same address, and you shouldn't have any problems with
>} delivering the list.
>} * *
>}
>} Sounds reasonable to me - it puts the burden of managing their list
>} traffic back onto the subscriber (where it belongs).
>
>Except that means that each dirtlink subscriber will have to add every
>poster to the good list as most lists appear to be from the originator
>(except digests).

Scary point.  Let's hope "from" means RFC821 "mail from:" and not RFC822
"from:"  ;-)
                            -Kary