|
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 11 Nov 1996 15:30:00 EST |
In-Reply-To: |
bdienes AT glinx.com -- Thu, 7 Nov 1996 17:07:01 -0400 (AST) |
Comments: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
(Bruce -- sorry for this last "response.")
>>It might be worthwhile to send an individual e-mail to
>>each subscriber of QUAKER-M and see what happens.
>I can send direct mail to each of the Q-M folks (there are only five of
>us -- it's a list for adminstration of the others -- we direct error
>messages and posts for moderation to Q-M from Q-L and Q-P).
>>Alternatively ...
>>
>>SET QUAKER-M SHORT822 FOR *@*
>>QUIET SET QUAKER-M SHORT FOR *@*
>>
>>might be easier. I conjecture that a subscriber of QUAKER-M
>>might be forwarding to (or subscribed AS) the OWNER-quaker-m.
>The SHORT option is the default for Q-L and Q-P.
>How would that change things for Q-M? (i.e. what do you intend to
>accomplish with the short headers?) Would this address the possible
>forwarding issue?
The purpose of SET SHORT822 followed by QUIET SET SHORT
was to cause LISTSERV to generate a one-time e-mail to
each SUBSCRIBER of QUAKER-M for purpose of diagnosis.
This is one of my tools in my bag when I'm too lazy to
generate my own e-mail to each individual subscriber.
Technically, your ERRORS-TO= is in error. The first
operand should NOT be a list but a userid of a non-LISTSERV-
based entity i.e., no indirect (LISTSERV) address.
* Quaker concerns re community, spirituality, etc.
* Editor= [log in to unmask],(QUAKER-M)
|
|
|