On: Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 01:11:42PM -0400,Francoise Becker Wrote:

} Because, as of midnight on 5/31 (the beginning end, not the tail 
} end), the last errors happened on 5/26. So the 5/31 report reported 
} that the last error was received 5/26. Then on 5/31 -- after the 
} monitoring report had gone one -- more bounces arrived. When it came 
} time for bounce monitoring just after midnight on 6/1 it saw bounces 
} starting 5/26 and ending 5/31. Since this met the conditions for auto-
} delete, the addresses were deleted, and no longer monitored. If the 
} "delay" on your Auto-Delete had been 6 instead of 5, then the report 
} on 6/1 would have had start of 5/26 and end of 5/31.

Francoise & Pete,
OK, thanks.

-- 
Rich Greenberg N6LRT Marietta, GA, USA richgr atsign panix.com + 1 770 321 6507
Eastern time zone.   I speak for myself & my dogs only.     VM'er since CP-67
Canines:Val, Red & Shasta (RIP),Red, husky                   Owner:Chinook-L
Atlanta Siberian Husky Rescue. www.panix.com/~richgr/   Asst Owner:Sibernet-L