> > ... The anti-spam contingent in SPAM-L seems to be completely
> > obsessed
> >with a macho posture of burning-the-village-to-save-it ...
>
> This statement is nothing less than an ad hominem attack on every
> SPAM-L subscriber. As a subscriber to both LSTOWN-L and SPAM-L, a

I'm an active SPAM-L subscriber and don't see Kary's statement being in
anyway close to an ad hominem attack on me.

There is a contingent on that list that feels like spam should be stopped *at
any cost* though.

  ...Cleo  [log in to unmask]