|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 2 Sep 1996 23:31:22 -0700 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Winship wrote:
> but the possible errors are so many, and the possible variations on
> the error messages so enormous, and there are so many brain-dead systems
Like the one that calmly explained that it was "not a typewriter" ... We're
still trying to figure that one out. <grin>
> There are alternatives to delete and nomail. Delete may be perceived as ...
> a very substantial number of useless subs set nomail. We have been setting
> errant subs to Digest (those which are already digest present a problem,
Which, unfortunately, lands a whopping big digest in your mail box for each
repeat error of this type. That's why I *refuse* to do that. Have you
considered setting people to "index" instead? They can thus fetch the missing
info for themselves, but the listowner isn't bothered by the big bouncies.
> Douglas
Mario Rups
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|