Who needs a law?  How about a listowner option?  Delete everything
following ----.  Seems simple to me, you do it or not - your choice.  After
all, it is not like listowners don't decide any other parameters.  I would
do it in a minute on my lists.



At 04:17 PM 2/21/99 +0100, you wrote:
>Message from Michael S. Johnson [06:34 99-02-21 ]:
>
>
>>Relating this by analogy to law: a recent news report exposed general
>>ignorance of a 20-year old law that requires motorists in Washington State
>>to carry a trash receptacle.  Rhetorical question: Does that ignorance
>>mean that the law should not be followed?
>>
>>Of course, no one has given evidence that there is a "law"/RFC about "--
>>", so the analogy is imperfect.  Suggestion: why not propose it as a *new*
>>RFC?
>
>Yes, the analogy was not perfect because we do not have any
>law or even a recommendation concerning signatures.
>
>The idea of standardization of sigs is a good one.
>
>mjw