On: Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 07:45:26PM -0500,Rich Greenberg Wrote:

} On: Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 05:41:39PM -0600,Winship Wrote:
} 
} } On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Rich Greenberg wrote:
} } > Periodically (basically whenever I think of it) I send in the following
} } > to Apple:
} } > // job  pw=xxxxxxxx
} } > review chinook-l all
} } > query chinook-l for *@*
} } > review sibernet-l all
} } > query sibernet-l for *@*
} } > // eoj
} } 
} } Just wondering, why are you sending it that way?  Why not simply send it
} } as:
} } review chinook-l all
} } query chinook-l for *@*
} } review sibernet-l all
} } query sibernet-l for *@*
} } 
} } without the old "job" stuff?  LISTSERV has accepted "stacked" commands
} } for more years than I can recall.  The only problem I has found is if
} } you include a list archive search you need to be sure to put it last;
} } if it is first it is the only one which will be processed.
} 
} No particular reason except habit.  Does REVIEW or QUERY need a
} password?

Aparantly it doesn't because I just tried it.  And this time the one
thats usually last is last.  So I am guessing that its random with the
largest one usually coming in last.

O well.  At least I have removed a bug from my analysis program.

-- 
Rich Greenberg  N Ft Myers, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com  + 1 239 543 1353
Eastern time.  N6LRT  I speak for myself & my dogs only.    VM'er since CP-67
Canines:Val, Red, Shasta & Casey (RIP), Red & Zero, Siberians  Owner:Chinook-L
Retired at the beach                                     Asst Owner:Sibernet-L