LSTOWN-L Archives

LISTSERV List Owners' Forum

LSTOWN-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Melvin Klassen <[log in to unmask]>
Thu, 13 Feb 1997 10:10:10 PST
text/plain (24 lines)
On Tue, 11 Feb 1997 22:09:15 -0600, Brian Crawford <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Anybody know the current appropriate address at AOL to report net abuse?

The ID [log in to unmask] has always worked for me.

> Reports to [log in to unmask] have gone unanswered.
> Today, I also copied [log in to unmask] on a few reports,
> but still no answer ...

Given that the Attorneys-General of 44 US states have been in discussion
with AOL's lawyers over the problems which AOL created for themselves by
allowing "unlimited" access, I suspect that any E-mail to AOL employees would
just be a "drop-in-the-bucket" compared to the deluge from their customers.

Have patience; certainly, the "list-owners" of mailing-lists
should understand this most of all, and have a little sympathy.

For more about AOL, see: http://WWW.CANOE.CA/CyberNetIndustry/feb12_aol.html
(Canadian Online Explorer: "A Chat with the Chief of America Online".)

I agree with Peter Weiss: their presence and responsiveness on 'SPAM-L'
has been outstanding.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2