>Kind of...   I'm trying to formulate a policy for my lists re
>"deferred" mail, and I want it to be reasonably fair, but basically
>I want to tell people with sites that chronically "defer" that
>they will have to get another ISP if they want to remain
>subscribed.
>
>I know this may be drastic, but I'm sick of dealing with this
>problem.  There's a difference between a site that is doing
>maintenance (or whatever) and that defers for a few hours once
>a month or so, and a site that defers mail every day.  And I
>also get tired of responding to the subscribers from those
>sites who want to know why their mail was late, or out-of-order,
 
Ruth, put something in your welcome message about it. Refer them back to
THAT. For addresses that perpetually offend, I delete 'em. We have a large
list, and I can't stand the error mail building up.  Just my opinion. : ) K
 
Kathleen B. Bruce, BSN, IBCLC co-owner Lactnet, LLLOL, Corgi-L
Independent Consultant with Excellent Sense of Humor : D
LACTNET WWW site: http://www.mcs.com/~auerbach/lactation.html
LACTNET archives http://library.ummed.edu/lsv/archives/lactnet.html