In article <[log in to unmask]>,
Pete Weiss <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>I'm not subscribed to WEBTV, and my mail via PLUM was 8 hrs late this
>a.m.  Others not on WEBTV and not located at PSU.EDU are commenting likewise.
>
>Whatever problems WEBTV may or may not have is not what I was
>specifically commenting on, but they delay that was (and perhaps is?)
>occurred.

Subscribers from multiple domains to my mailing list
<[log in to unmask]> are also complaining of delays of eight
hours or more.  Unless I'm misinterpreting them, mail headers suggest
the delay is occurring at L-Soft.

>Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>Received: from mx02.mail.gol.com (mx02.mail.gol.com [203.216.5.22])
>        by gol1.gol.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/892-LEGACY-P) with ESMTP id PAA04861;
>        Fri, 5 Mar 1999 15:46:09 +0900 (JST)
>Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [209.119.1.27])
>        by mx02.mail.gol.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/893-MX-P) with ESMTP id PAA15990;
>        Fri, 5 Mar 1999 15:45:45 +0900 (JST)
>Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for
> OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 1:39
>:30 -0500
>Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP
>          release 1.8d) with spool id 36377173 for
>          [log in to unmask]; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:46:06 -0500
>Received: from 207.115.153.32 by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0d) with
>          TCP; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:46:05 -0500
>Received: from james (1Cust23.tnt1.sfo3.da.uu.net [153.36.254.23]) by
>          mail1.gte.net  with SMTP id QAA14024 for
>          <[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 16:44:21 -0600 (CST)
>

--
_____________________________________________________________________________
Dan Kanagy              PGP key ID: 0xAB08C3F1            [log in to unmask]
Tokyo, Japan                                              [log in to unmask]