Dont forget that ACK only reports the members who are set MAIL and not
DIGEST.

This fouls many people up :)

--
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
|               Michael Loftis -- SYSOP trashcan.nws.net              |
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~


On Sun, 1 Jun 1997, George Blake wrote:

> >Personally, I've no idea why anyone would WANT ACK any more.  Made sense in
> >the good ol' days of BITNET and 9600 bps links, but not now.  All of my
> >lists default to ACK off, REPRO on.  I've had VERY few complaints from
> >anyone, ever, in seven years.
> >
> I'm one of those people you have no idea about, Dan.<grin>
> I have ACK on all my lists. I like to see the number of subscribers my
> messages are going to. Especially on the list I run since it changes daily.
>
>
>
>
> George Blake, Ph.D.            [log in to unmask]
> American Association of Psychiatric Technicians, Inc.
> Certifying Mental Health Workers Nationwide
> For information go to http://www.niia.net/~aapt
>
> For mental health worker discussion send message to
> [log in to unmask] with this in the body
> SUBSCRIBE MENTAL-HEALTH-WORKER YourFullNameHere
>