>Aldo-Pier Solari writes
>>
>>The  issue, here, is that various .com sources start using sig files
>>for announcements to PUMP IN their  PR "n" times/year ONCE they have
>>been warned NOT TO abuse of the forum: This implies, in my  view,  a
>>clear  abuse  of  the  unwritten  law  that  "sig  files may include
>>whatever".
 
>Certainly there was no such problem observable in Ms. Nachman's signature.
>It contained no "PR", only a pointer to a Web page.  No solicitation was
>made, and no advertising was presented.  I think your "issue" is a canard.
 
[snip]
>--
>Lefty [gYon-Pa] <[log in to unmask]>
>C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
 
 
Thank you for that. It is the funniest thing I have read all week.
 
--
Life has no riddle. How utterly infantile to think such a thing.
It's here. You make use of it while you can.
http://cust.iamerica.net/mcdivitt/