On 7/21/99 7:15 AM, Stan Ryckman <[log in to unmask]> wrote...

>>2: Why not "Set <listname> NOMAIL"?  That's what it's there for.
>
>And why shouldn't that be confirmed?  If person A dislikes person B,
>this can be forged just as easily as an UNSUB.

NOMAIL isn't so destructive. You don't lose all your settings, your
subscription date, and non-moderated status (if applicable). And you
don't have to go through a hassle (more confirmations) to start receiving
mail again.

Admittedly, if someone wants to cause trouble for someone else, they're
gonna do it. It's simple a matter of where you want to draw the line.


--
Adam Bailey    | Chicago, Illinois
[log in to unmask] | Finger/Web for PGP
[log in to unmask] | http://www.lull.org/adam/