I misserd all of this, but I too am turning my materials over to a
 lawyer as it is the better way as Eric pointed out. -- Paul.
 
> This is  just a reminder  that, in  a few hours,  we, the members  of the
> "Keep LST*-L Clean"  class action suit ("We"), will be  expecting (1) ALL
> discussions  related to  spams, other  than  side comments  that are  (i)
> short, (ii)  to the  point and  (iii) non-soapboxish  in nature,  to take
> place on the new SPAM-L list. In particular, We will be expecting (2) all
> copies of spams that  We may have been unfortunate enough  to miss due to
> the spam  filter getting  in the  way of our  collective enjoyment  to be
> reposted exclusively to  SPAM-L. Let it hereby be known  that (3) We have
> obtained  a restraining  order allowing  us to  actually kick  people off
> either or both list, or any combination  thereof, for a period of 1 (one)
> week if We see (i) spams forwarded to LSTSRV-L or LSTOWN-L or (ii) "I saw
> it on XYZ-L as well!"  messages resulting from unfortunate occurrences of
> the actions described  in Section 3(i), or  any reasonable interpretation
> thereof,  including,  without  limitation,  the  "Delete  First  And  Ask
> Questions Later" act of 1986, and its subsequent revisions.
>
>   Eric
>
 
 
- --
 
Dr. Paul S. di Virgilio,  University of Toronto  [log in to unmask]