LSTOWN-L Archives

LISTSERV List Owners' Forum

LSTOWN-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Parts/Attachments: text/plain (23 lines)
Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Pete Weiss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 10:40:12 -0400
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
At 09:54 08/06/2002 Tuesday, Gary Bannister wrote:
 >We run a number of lists and some moron has added several of our "<list>-
 >request" addresses to one of those lists of 30 million email addresses that
 >spammers sell to brain-dead companies.  List owners are complaining about
 >the spam now being sent to these addresses.  I am inclined to route these
 >addresses to the bit bucket at least for a while but I am not certain what
 >good information may be lost.  Does anybody know?  Does anyone have a
 >better solution?
End Reply

Well the -REQUEST address is the "official" method of contacting
non-quiet list-owner(s).  Also mailing that generic address generates an
auto-ack to the supposed sender, which can be problematic when KLEZ virus
spoofing is involved (which seems to be the most frequent abuse that I see).

Thus, I've updated my listname.MAILTPL template REQACK1 to suppress auto-acks

using the

.QQ

formatting command.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2