LSTOWN-L Archives

LISTSERV List Owners' Forum

LSTOWN-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Parts/Attachments: TEXT/PLAIN (16 lines)
Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Stan Horwitz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 5 Aug 2001 12:35:15 -0400
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
On Sun, 5 Aug 2001, Philip Kizer wrote:

> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >> What does this trend portend for Listserv?  Is there a need for Listserv to
> >> start using encryption procedures to protect itself and those using it?
> >
> Stan Horwitz <[log in to unmask]> responded:
> >Thus far, Listserv has remained immuned from hacking attempts. [ ... ]
>
> Listserv (with the 2000b patches/etc) seems all fine and dandy as far as
> anyone's been able to prove, but that doesn't mean the lists it holds are
> necessarily immune.

Of course. Software always cannot prevent users from doing foolish things.
What you are talking about is user behavior, not software behavior.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2