|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Date: |
Mon, 12 May 2003 19:57:07 -0400 |
Content-Disposition: |
inline |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<3EBFDEB7.7103.19BABCD@localhost> |
Sender: |
|
On: Mon, May 12, 2003 at 05:49:43PM -0400,Paul Karagianis Wrote:
} On 12 May 2003, at 17:36, Paul Karagianis wrote:
}
} >Scary point. Let's hope "from" means RFC821 "mail from:" and not RFC822
} >"from:" ;-)
} > -Kary
}
} (Reads what he just wrote... thinks: "Uh Oh".) Or maybe not. That has
} its own problems... like most spammers using blank "mail from"s. -Kary
Perhaps the answer is that if the To: line is not the owner of the
account, the mail will be passed if the To: is the list address that the
user has added to a whitelist. The problem there is the spammers will
make the To: look like a list.
Someone needs to run this by dirtlink support and participate in the
design.
--
Rich Greenberg Work: Rich.Greenberg atsign worldspan.com + 1 770 563 6656
N6LRT Marietta, GA, USA Play: richgr atsign panix.com + 1 770 321 6507
Eastern time zone. I speak for myself & my dogs only. VM'er since CP-67
Canines:Val(Chinook,CGC,TT), Red & Shasta(Husky,(RIP)) Owner:Chinook-L
Atlanta Siberian Husky Rescue. www.panix.com/~richgr/ Asst Owner:Sibernet-L
|
|
|