LSTOWN-L Archives

LISTSERV List Owners' Forum

LSTOWN-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Bill Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:35:52 -0400
text/plain (88 lines)
I try to cover the bases for most out of office subjects and reject them.
My lists would probably be dropping this thread though...  Here are my
standard content filtering rules:

subject: Out of the office
action: reject
subject: automated response
action: reject
subject: OutOfOffice
action: reject
subject: Out Of Office
action: reject
subject: I am not here
action: reject
subject: Gone Fishing
action: reject Get back to work!!

The last was entered as a joke that has sort of stuck around....

So far, I've had no complaints on the 40some lists on our site.  Before we
switched to LSoft, this was a hugh problem.

---

Inanimate objects rock with glee
as they conspire to baffle me.  - Ogden Nash

William Brown
Email/Internet Services
Erie 1 BOCES
(716)821-7285




Adam O'Toole <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
07/18/2003 02:04 PM
Please respond to
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
Re: [LSTOWN-L] Out of Office AutoReply: Help Deleting Archives






Perhaps this would be a good opportunity to ask - what is
the best way to filter messages to a list based on content?

Return Reciepts from Exchange are also pesky, I've found,
as they generate automatic responses from every Outlook
client in use among list members.

It would be nice to be able to design these list management
problems out - everyone gets a braino once in a while.


Adam O'Toole
[log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: Winship [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:09 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LSTOWN-L] Out of Office AutoReply: Help Deleting Archives


> I will be out of the office until Tuesday, Tuesday 7/22.  If you need
> assistance please email "[log in to unmask]" or call x62140.
Thank
> you.

Have I mentioned recently how much I loath ooofbots?  That a subscriber
to this list would implement an ooofbot, without first setting his list
subscription NOMAIL, or at least DIGEST, is, to me, incomprehensible.

Douglas Winship
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2