|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 19 Apr 1997 23:46:57 -0600 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
At 04:49 AM 4/20/97 GMT, you wrote:
>The 2 addresses cannot be exactly the same, or LISTSERV will set the
>subscription to the last set received. However, if you 'jigger' one of
>the addresses (in a way that still works, i.e. a valid address) that could
>work, but you have to reverse the settings you suggest.
>
>For example, my address is [log in to unmask] But you can also send
>email to [log in to unmask], which LISTSERV will see as a
>different address, but it also gets to me without fail if you send to it.
Another angle is to have one as Bparker@.... and one as bparker@....
On some systems those would be treated differently and it wouldn't work for
the user, but on many/most they would be the same. To LISTSERV they are
different.
>
>His 'real' address set nomail, repro. This is so LISTSERV will echo back
>to him whenever he posts, this will only work for the address he writes
>from. Note, LISTSERV will echo your post to you even if you are set
>NOMAIL, since the REPRO copy is not considered as 'mail', but a response
>to a kind of 'command'.
I agree with you. But another experienced listowner has said the opposite.
I don't find a clear answer in the docs. Can anyone verify this by
experience? Or a doc source I didn't find?
dan
Dan Lester
[log in to unmask]
In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. Erasmus, 1534
|
|
|