|
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 Sep 1996 12:45:54 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
For what it's worth, on the law school mailing list (go figure), I've had
to defend the title "list owner" three times. Everytime, I've launched
into a tirade which combined "what's in a name" and "you have to call the
guy running the list something; LSOFT picked 'listowner'; live with it"
It's worked so far- what are they gonna do anyway? Let 'em bitch. :)
Philo
On Wed, 11 Sep 1996, Nathan Brindle wrote:
> The beauty is that you can call yourself whatever you want, i.e., for
> use in administrative postings or what have you. For a long time I used
> "List administrator", then decided that sounded too pompous and used
> "List manager", and finally have devolved back to "List owner" :). In
> point of fact I doubt that many people will look at your list header and
> wonder why you're the "Owner=". Lord knows I can't count how many lists
> I own these days and no one has ever asked <me>. :))
>
> Just my $0.02,
> Nathan
>
|
|
|