|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:47:42 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
<Pine.GSO.4.44.0208202313360.16032-100000@infinity> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" |
Reply-To: |
|
One downside of "Reply-to= List" is that if someone blithely hits the
reply buttons to send a personal reply to the sender, it will go to
the whole list. "Reply-to= Sender" avoids this problem. But folks
then have to "reply all" (and delete the sender's address from the
To: or Cc: field) to reply just to the whole list. It may be worth
it if you manage to avoid a bunch of personal email traffic. ...TB
At 11:22 PM -0500 8/20/02, Winship wrote:
>Change your list header keyword Reply-to= to:
>* Reply-to= List
>
>This won't gurantee that all replies go only to the list, but it will make
>it more likely that those who blithely hit their "reply" buttons without
>paying any attention to where the reply actually is sent will send their
>replies only to the list. Their is no accounting for what some mail
>systems, or their users, will do.
>
>From what you say, it sounds like maybe you have either
>* Reply-to= Both
>or
>* Reply-to= Both,Ignore
>
>Douglas [log in to unmask]
--
Tom Burke, Department of Philosophy, University of South Carolina,
Columbia SC, USA 29208 / Phone: 803-777-3733 / Email: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|