As one of the more experienced  LISTSERV Postmasters and List Owners, I would
not like  to see  LSTOWN-L broken  into 'novice/veteran'  lists. I  would not
want  to  have to  make  the  personal  decision  of following  another  list
('novice') with the large number of  lists I already follow. I think LSTOWN-L
can be useful for both novice and veteran LISTSERV list owners.
 
If  we're taking  a vote,  and I  *hope* we're  not, I  vote 'no'  for the  2
different list idea.
 
Please, let's  get this list  back on topic and  continue to help  each other
better manage  our LISTSERV lists  and therefore better serve  our customers.
 
BTW, when  referrinf to LISTSERV  in writing, please *always*  capitalize it.
LISTSERV  is  LISTSERV,  not  ListServ,  not  Listserv,  not  Listserve,  not
listserv, not (well, you get my drift ;-) ).
 
Thanks for reading this note (seems  I've been infected with John's "Saturday
Morning Let's Catch Up On List Mail" bug too.
 
 
Jim Gerland  - Consultant, Network User Support           University at Buffalo
Academic Services, Computing & Information Technology     Buffalo, NY 14260
716.645.3557 Work                                         716.645.3734 FAX
[log in to unmask]                              [log in to unmask]