|
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 15 Sep 1995 10:26:26 EST |
Organization: |
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME |
Reply-To: |
|
I hoping for confirmation that I'm interpreting the following message
correctly. When the message reaches NDRESNET, Listserv looks at the From:
line, determines that Rich Graves <[log in to unmask]>
is not subscribed, and so it goes to the Owner--Right?
Now, looking at To:; [log in to unmask] is an email address that
received the message from Graves and passed it to NDRESNET (resnet-forum is
subscribed to the list). It should be From: [log in to unmask] to
be processed correctly. Is either mailer "at fault"?
===========================================================================
Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from IRISHVMA (NJE origin SMTP@IRISHVMA) by VMA.CC.ND.EDU (LMail
V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3298; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 01:46:41 -0500
Received: from MIT.EDU by VMA.CC.ND.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP;
Fri, 15 Sep 95 01:46:40 EST
Received: from networking.Stanford.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
id AA09194; Fri, 15 Sep 95 02:01:26 EDT
Received: (from llurch@localhost) by Networking.Stanford.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.6) id
XAA01146; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 23:01:40 -0700
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1995 23:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rich Graves <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: 10BaseT ethernet hubs
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
X-Pgp-Key: finger [log in to unmask]
X-Url: http://www-leland.stanford.edu/~llurch/
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
... message deleted
Kevin ** SIGNATURE LITE **
|
|
|