How effective would it be to have the list options "Reply-To= List,Ignore"
when dealing with a virus like this?  Too bad the list can't be set up to
remove the sender address completely.

On 15 Jun 2001, at 14:49, Jacob Haller wrote:

> >Why wasn't the virus sent to the list address?  (We were ready for
> >that:  we lowered the max. message size to 180 lines).  Is there
> >anything we can do (with the LSOFT listserv options) to MAKE a virus
> >send it to the list address next time, instead of sending off-list
> >contaminated messages?
>
> No.  That's under the control of the author of the virus, who
> unfortunately doesn't appear to be inclined to make things easy for
> list owners.  ;-)


--
     mailto:[log in to unmask]       KA7MYM
     http://cc-ent.com/Spiritbrook    ICQ 4014832
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost
that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make
intercession for them. Hebrews 7:25