Wed, 30 Mar 1994 00:20:28 EST
|
On Tue, 29 Mar 1994 15:49:12 -0600 you said:
> IMHO any system which includes a file like
> sendmail.cf which people can tinker with
> is severely under-designed. Mail systems
> should not be tailored. Mail systems
> should have simple addresses and tailoring
> should be unnecessary.
Well, yeah. And the Easter Bunny should bring me eggs this coming weekend.
Unfortunately, some of us run production systems that move 100,000 or more
pieces of e-mail a day. And we need to be able to deal with all the vagarities
of existent mail systems. Personally, I consider it *good* that sendmail
allows a .cf file which allows me to specify "Deal this way with SMTP,
and this way with Decnet, and this way with UUCP, and this way with Bitnet,
and do *this* really crufty hack to deal with our local homegrown Single
System Image distributed e-mail system, and do this *other* hack to make
e-mail to [log in to unmask] work, no matter where they REALLY get their mail,
and..."
And yes, we actually have a production machine here that does all that.
And we did it all in the sendmail.cf file.
Valdis Kletnieks
Computer Systems Engineer
Virginia Polytechnic Institute
|
|
|