Could someone explain the difference between shortbsmtp and fullbsmtp?
I don't understand why this makes a difference in the routing of the mail.
You can see from the following that shortbsmtp gives a normal direct
route whereas fullbsmtp causes a circuitous route through several mailers.
....Kent
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=FULLBSMTP=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
FROM LISTSERV:
> q banyan-l
Distribution options for Kent Percival <[log in to unmask]>,
list BANYAN-L: Ack= No, Mail= Yes, Files= Yes,
Repro= No, Header= Full(BSMTP), Conceal= No
HEADER:
%Received: from UOGUELPH by VM.UOGUELPH.CA (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 6843;
% Wed, 27 Mar 91 12:49:21 EST
%Received: from ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca by vm.uoguelph.ca (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.2MX)
% with TCP; Wed, 27 Mar 91 12:49:18 EST
%Received: from PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU by ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca with BSMTP id <23248>
% Wed, 27 Mar 1991 12:46:31 -0500
%Received: from PUCC.BITNET by PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU (Mailer R2.08 Beta) with BSMTP
% id 5990; Wed, 27 Mar 91 12:46:57 EST
%Received: from AKRONVM by AKRONVM.UAkron.Edu (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 3389;
% Wed, 27 Mar 91 10:59:59 EST
%Received: from ucdavis.ucdavis.edu by vm1.cc.UAKRON.EDU (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.2MX)
% with TCP; Wed, 27 Mar 91 10:59:53 EST
%Received: by ucdavis.ucdavis.edu (5.61/UCD2.03) id AA09426; Wed,
% 27 Mar 91 07:59:49 -0800
%Received: from banyan.usace.mil by longbow.usace.mil (4.0/SMI-4.0(SPK MX)) id
% AA27653; Wed, 27 Mar 91 07:50:01 PST
%Received: by banyan.usace.mil with VINES ; Wed, 27 Mar 91 07:57:32 PST
%Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
%Newsgroups: bit.listserv.banyan-l
%Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1991 10:52:45 -0500
%Reply-To: Banyan Networks Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
%Sender: Banyan Networks Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
%From: [log in to unmask]
%Subject: re: X.400 gateway ???
%X-To: [log in to unmask]
%To: Multiple recipients of list BANYAN-L <BANYAN-L@AKRONVM>
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-SHORTBSMTP=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
FROM LISTSERV:
> q banyan-l
Distribution options for Kent Percival <[log in to unmask]>,
list BANYAN-L: Ack= No, Mail= Yes, Files= Yes,
Repro= No, Header= Short(BSMTP), Conceal= No
HEADER:
%Received: from UOGUELPH by VM.UOGUELPH.CA (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 0366;
% Wed, 27 Mar 91 21:24:44 EST
%Received: from vm.utcs.utoronto.ca by vm.uoguelph.ca (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.2MX) wit
% TCP; Wed, 27 Mar 91 21:24:38 EST
%Received: from UTORONTO.BITNET by vm.utcs.utoronto.ca (IBM VM SMTP V2R1)
% with BSMTP id 2991; Wed, 27 Mar 91 21:21:35 EST
%Date: Wed, 27 Mar 91 10:52:30 EST
%Reply-To: Banyan Networks Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
%Sender: Banyan Networks Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
%From: [log in to unmask]
%Subject: x.400
%X-To: [log in to unmask]
%To: Multiple recipients of list BANYAN-L <BANYAN-L@AKRONVM>
|
