LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Eric Thomas <ERIC@FRECP11>
Tue, 9 Feb 88 20:17:00 SET
text/plain (40 lines)
Today we have been off the network from early in the morning until 16:30 local
time. Nevertheless,  LISTSERV managed  to eat  45 minutes of  CPU time  and to
generate 167000  lines of punch output.  Unfortunately part of this  output is
for  local printers,  so I  can't know  exactly how  much network  traffic was
generated. What  is sure is that  we received 178 files  today and transmitted
842, of which 803  came from LISTSERV or MAILER (but  then MAILER also handles
mail from local users, so I don't  know the exact proportion). Guess what list
generated 80% of this traffic?
 
At the risk of  sounding like I am being unfair to INFO-VAX,  I have to inform
you  that our  management is  very  worried about  the resource  usage of  our
LISTSERV, which  they see as "spending  most of its time  processing junk from
the network that our institution is  not even interested in". I can understand
their concern, though:  today our poor 1.5 Mips machine  was so saturated that
its expansion factor went up to 29, with 21  users in Q2, 13 in Q1, and a page
steal rate of 65% (in other words, it  took 10 seconds to get to the next page
when pressing  the PF8 key).  This isn't due to  LISTSERV of course,  but it's
much more difficult to justify CPU usage when the machine is oversaturated.
 
Anyway: I have, a few weeks ago, altered  the link weights file to reduce to a
minimum  the load  on FRMOP22-CEARN,  even though  it meant  extra traffic  on
FRMOP22-FRORS12 and  FRORS12-FRECP11. If the situation  doesn't change shortly
(ie if LISTSERV keeps  eating 45 minutes of CPU a day), I  will have to change
the tables before  the end of next  week so that we no  longer process traffic
not  destined  to  us.  This  means that  traffic  would  flow  directly  from
LISTSERV@CEARN to LISTSERV@ICNUCEVM,  LISTSERV@BITNIC, LISTSERV@EB0UB011, etc.
Under normal  conditions I  would have  fought the  case with  our management,
mentioning the  prestige of nodeid FRECP11  and suchlike, but this  has become
impossible  since I  am  leaving this  place  in  a few  months  and they  are
considering getting rid  of all the garbage I have  written or installed, RSCS
security mods,  LISTSERV, MAILER  and RELAY included  (well, that's  what they
say, maybe  they're just trying to  frighten me which is  stupid but nevermind
:-) ).
 
In any case there's not much I can do, and what little I can will last at best
3 months. So we  should be looking for solutions to  this problem before we're
in trouble.
 
  Eric

ATOM RSS1 RSS2