LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
ITS Dean Limbaugh <[log in to unmask]>
Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:22:06 -0400
text/plain (41 lines)
We have no problems, some of our weekly archive files are over 512MB, and
they index ok.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Verity" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:47 AM
Subject: Yearly v.s. monthly historical archives


> For most our our lists, I keep archives for just a short period of
> time, typically less than a year.  But a few are archived forever.
> Currently the old archives are monthly, so each year has 12 files.  I
> suspect people might visually browse recent archives but might only
> search older archives with the web or email tools.  What would the
> pros and cons be for creating yearly files for past years?
>
> Some pros the come to mind are:
>
> * Fewer files on the server.
> * Shorter screens on the archive web pages.
>
> A  con might be:
> * Larger files on the server
> * Server might balk at indexing large yearly files.
> --
> Cheerfulness is contagious, but don't wait to catch it from others.
> Be a "carrier".
>
> Bill Verity - 814-865-4758  Fax: 814-863-7049
> 215A Computer Building - Information Technology Services, Penn State
University
> At the office - on my Mac, of course ;-)
>
>
> Inbound Mail Scanned by Mcafee Web Appliance.



OutBound Mail Scanned by Mcafee Web Appliance.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2