Foo, indeed.

So, here's a clip of my syslog of the sequence for a listserv "thanks" command:

Jun 12 10:48:48 cable sendmail[7668]: [ID 801593 mail.info] f5CFmml07668:
from=<[log in to unmask]>, size=367, class=0, nrcpt]
Jun 12 10:48:48 cable sendmail[7669]: [ID 801593 mail.info] f5CFmml07669:
clone f5CFmml07668, owner=owner-listserv
Jun 12 10:48:49 cable LSV:lsv_amin[7671]: [ID 831251 mail.info] Mail for
listserv (from 1/1008) delivered to LISTSERV.
Jun 12 10:48:49 cable sendmail[7669]: [ID 801593 mail.info] f5CFmml07669:
to="|/usr/local/bin/lsv_amin /opt/listserv/spool listservt
Jun 12 10:48:49 cable sendmail[7673]: [ID 801593 mail.info] f5CFmnl07673:
from=<>, size=480, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200106121548]
Jun 12 10:48:50 cable sendmail[7674]: [ID 801593 mail.info] f5CFmnl07673:
to=<[log in to unmask]>, delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:t

Note that when lsv_amin sends the mail to sendmail (I assume that lsv_amin
sends to port 25 of localhost), the from address is the null string
"<>".  That is probably a bad thing.  Can you test this on your system?

Dave

At 11:38 AM 6/12/2001 -0400, [log in to unmask] wrote:

>On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:12:49 CDT, you said:
> > $ gcc -v
> > Reading specs from /opt/sfw/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/2.95.2/specs
> > gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
>
>Foo.  It's a current version, built for the current release of Solaris.
>That rules out 95% of the obvious issues with using GCC.
>
>I'll have to ponder this one...
>
>/Valdis

--
David Devereaux-Weber, P.E.
Network Services
Division of Information Technology
The University of Wisconsin - Madison
[log in to unmask]  http://cable.doit.wisc.edu
(608)262-3584