On    Tue,   2    Jun   1992    16:44:05   CST    "Juan   M.    Courcoul"
<[log in to unmask]> said:
 
>Given that your server has the  latest PEERS NAMES and given Princeton's
>networking involvement,  it would seem odd  that they set up  a Listserv
>and  fail   to  register  it.   Perhaps  a  letter  to   Michael  Gettes
>([log in to unmask]) can either  clear things up or  help pinpoint the
>origin of the bogus file.
 
This is a test server, which  cannot and should not be registered because
it does  not "speak"  for the  PUCC node  when it  broadcasts information
about its local lists - it only speaks about the setup of the test server
at PUCC. Test servers ought to be  configured to talk to a separate RSCS,
placed  in  debug  mode,  or  otherwise made  not  to  try  to  broadcast
information  on  the  production  network  in  whatever  way  seems  most
appropriate, but nothing serious happens if this is not done.
 
  Eric