"Eric Thomas (CERN/L3)" <ERIC@LEPICS>
Thu, 6 Apr 89 11:00:07 GMT
|
Zvika, there is no such notion as "closest backbone server" in a network
where distances are determined dynamically (because there are so many
servers that it is not possible for a human being to decide which is the
closest for all 2500+ nodes in the network), and where everybody may not
have the same versions of the nodes table, at least during relatively
short (1 week or so) intervals of time. What if your closest server is A
on monday, and then becomes B on tuesday because a new BITEARN NODES is
out, and yet A thinks it is still the closest to you because it has not
yet received the new BITEARN NODES? And, of course, just telling your
closest server to set the suspend bit in your entry accomplishes nothing
unless all the appropriate servers are also notified, etc. Finally, if
you count the CPU time that must be spent by each server to keep
informing the "closest" ones of changes to the subscriptions, as compared
to the relatively small fraction of people who will indeed do a NETWIDE
suspend, you will see that this does not solve the problem.
Eric
|
|
|