LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
"CLARKE, Paul (M23)" <[log in to unmask]>
Thu, 30 Apr 1998 07:45:09 +1000
text/plain (47 lines)
You are right Ben,

I glanced at the paragraph while looking for something else earlier that
morning. Should have glanced harder!

Paul.
  Paul Clarke
  Online Curriculum Information Project Officer
  Open Access Unit
  Gabba Towers
  Level 6, 411 Vulture Street
  Woolloongabba Brisbane Qld 4102
  Ph:  07 3406 2755
  Fax: 07 3406 2756
  [log in to unmask]
> ----------
> From:         Ben Chi
> Sent:         Wednesday, 29 April 1998 12:24
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: [LSTSRV-L] Sending a message to every one even NOMAIL
>
> On Tue, 28 Apr 1998 12:03:13 [log in to unmask] said (apropos
> the question "Is there a way for the listowner to send a message to ALL
> subscribers, even those set NOMAIL?"):
>
> >If you set up a superlist with the list in question defined as a sublist
> >messages sent to the superlist will go to all members regardless of the
> >NOMAIL setting.
> >
> >See chapter 2.13.8 of the List owners manual r2
>
> That's a neat solution, except for the fact that this is not what section
> 2.13.8 says.  Quoting from there:
>
>     You will get the [message sent to the superlist] if you have an
>     active (not NOMAIL) subscription to at least one sub-list.  The
>     idea is that the super-message must be equivalent to posting to
>     all the sub-lists, without the duplicates.  Since all it takes
>     to get a message posted to all the sub-lists is a single
>     non-NOMAIL subscription, this is how the super-list works.
>
> My solution to this problem is to use REVIEW FOO-L to prepare a list of
> recipients and than let LISTSERV do a DISTRIBUTE job of my message to
> this list.
>                                              /b
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2