Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:18:17 -0500
|
That's a possibility, too. But it's impossible to say for sure without
details on what is actually in the digest. Just saying that the digest is
huge and that it has a cut point of 800 lines isn't sufficient to diagnose.
Nathan
At 03:11 PM 10/28/2004 -0400, Rich Greenberg wrote:
>On: Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 02:51:28PM -0400,Doug Essinger-Hileman Wrote:
>
>} All of a sudden, the size of my list's digest has gone berzerk, coming in
>} recently at anywhere from 2000 lines to over 6000 lines. Our header is
>
>My best guess is that one or more frequent posters is now using a mailer
>that sends very long lines. The next listserv update will allow you to
>specify digest size in both lines and k-bytes just to get around this.
>
>--
>Rich Greenberg N6LRT Marietta, GA, USA richgr atsign panix.com + 1 770 321
>6507
>Eastern time zone. I speak for myself & my dogs only. VM'er since CP-67
>Canines:Val, Red & Shasta (RIP),Red, husky Owner:Chinook-L
>Atlanta Siberian Husky Rescue. www.panix.com/~richgr/ Asst Owner:Sibernet-L
|
|
|