Phil Howard <PHIL@UIUCVMD>
Thu, 18 Feb 88 14:45:24 CST
|
MAYBE (yes?) this topics be moved over to IBMTCP-L ?
> From: Michael Wagner +49 228 303 245 <WAGNER@DBNGMD21>
> > On mail ENTERING the 80 character environment, this layer is
> > added, and on mail exiting the 80 character environment, this
> > layer is removed.
>
> That sounds reasonable. As long as people remember that, "that's
> not 822 running in there"
Right, an ENCODED RFC822, but encoded in such a way that it CAN look
almost like RFC822. A rather THIN wrapper.
> If the 80 character environment didn't seem like it was busy
> taking over the rest of the network, I wouldn't care much. But
> much BITNET software only implements an 80 characters subset, even
> when it isn't necessary. I get mail as punch files all the time,
> even though our software has been updated in the last 10 years,
> and so, we don't need to be pandered to in such a way.
How would you like your mail? Print? That's still limited to 132 or 150.
How about disk dump? netdata? card dump? pick your poison and rewrite
MAILER. BTW, I'll flame a choice of disk dump.
|
|
|