We have been getting the following error for the last few days.
Does anyone know what I am supposed to do (if anything) to fix this?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adam Floro
Systems Programmer
Information Technology Phone: (618) 453-6238
Southern Illinois University Fax: (618) 453-5261
Carbondale, IL 62901 E-mail: [log in to unmask]
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Received: from SIUCVMB.BITNET by SIUCVMB.BITNET (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id
5697; Tue, 14 Sep 93 10:38:02 CST
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1993 10:38:02 -0600
From: BITNET list server at SIUCVMB (1.7f) <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Problem processing mail file from [log in to unmask]
To: "Roy E. Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
Error occurred while processing file 2848 from [log in to unmask]: "Mail has been
received for list DEAF-L from a user which has been served out". Because of its
size, the original message has been transferred to CA0141@SIUCVMB; what you are
seeing below is only the first 100 lines.
---------------- Message causing the problem (first 100 lines) ----------------
Return-Path: <@VMD.CSO.UIUC.EDU:[log in to unmask]>
Received: from UIUCVMD (NJE origin SMTP@UIUCVMD) by VMD.CSO.UIUC.EDU (LMail
V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 3953; Tue, 14 Sep 1993 10:36:25 -0500
Received: from vm42.cso.uiuc.edu by vmd.cso.uiuc.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
with TCP; Tue, 14 Sep 93 10:36:23 CDT
Received: from att.att.com by vm42.cso.uiuc.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP;
Tue, 14 Sep 93 15:35:25 UTC
From: [log in to unmask]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 93 08:23:37 EDT
To: @VM42.CSO.UIUC.EDU,@VMD.CSO.UIUC.EDU:[log in to unmask]
Subject: mail warning
We have been unable to contact machine 'att-mh' to deliver mail you sent.
Our attempts to deliver your mail will continue for 6 more day(s).
No further action is required by you.
The following mail has not been delivered:
att-mh!mail hogpa.ho.att.com!cynthia (Date 09/10)
If you wish to kill the job, contact our administrator at
att!uucp and ask to kill UUCP job att-mhJe8d8.
Sincerely,
att!uucp
#################### Data File: ####################
From VM42.CSO.UIUC.EDU!VMD.CSO.UIUC.EDU!SIUCVMB.BITNET!DEAF-L Fri Sep 10
17:48:3
0 GMT 1993 remote from att
Received: by att.att.com; Fri Sep 10 15:17:34 EDT 1993
Received: from VM42.CSO.UIUC.EDU by vm42.cso.uiuc.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
with BSMTP id 3523; Fri, 10 Sep 93 19:25:42 UTC
Received: from VMD.CSO.UIUC.EDU (NJE origin MAILER@UIUCVMD) by
VM42.CSO.UIUC.EDU
(LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 0460; Fri, 10 Sep 1993 19:16:28 +0000
Received: from VMD.CSO.UIUC.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UIUCVMD) by
VMD.CSO.UIUC.EDU (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 5847; Fri,
10 Sep 1993 14:09:49 -0500
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1993 17:48:30 GMT
Reply-To: DEAF LIST <[log in to unmask]>
Sender: DEAF LIST <[log in to unmask]>
Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was [log in to unmask]
From: Sandra Barbosa <[log in to unmask]>
Organization: Boston University
Subject: Re: options
To: Multiple recipients of list DEAF-L
<[log in to unmask]
uiuc.edu>
: >The bottom line in the hearing world (and it's
: >terrible) but deaf=deaf. Whether you talk, lipread, write or sign...you
: >are not hearing. That's the bottom line. Signing Deaf have no problem with
: >this since they accept their deafness and find pride in their culture.
: >That is why I mentioned self-esteem.
: >
This means that although one may work very hard at being oral, one is still
deaf. There is a difference between being a Deaf person who signs within
their own culture and talks or mouths with hearing people, a Deaf person who
signs within their community and writes or gestures or uses an interpreter
with hearing people, and lastly a deaf person who is oral and refuses to
learn sign (for whatever reason) and tries to live a 'hearing' life.
In the eyes of a hearing 'man on the street' these people are the same. That
is what I meant. A Deaf person (note the capital D) has no problem with this
since they accept their deafness and have pride in their culture. Some/many/
most oralists do not find pride in their deafness and strive to be as
'hearing' as possible.
IMO someone who is content with their achievements and limitations has
greater self-esteem than someone who tries to be someone else.
I view Lew's choices like I view the choices that many children of immigrants
or very ethnic Americans make. They grow up, move away from the ethnicity,
change their last name , take voice lessons to get rid of their
accent and dress and play Mr & Mrs. White yuppie.
That is their right. I am not judging their decisions and choices. I am
simply noting that they have made a conscious decision to become or try
to become like 'everybody else', the majority. They do not find pride in
their 'uniqueness'. That (IMO) is evidence of low self-esteem.
Is it possible to exist in America and be both ethnic AND mainstream??????
I do. I have a rich Portuguese heritage that is part of my life although
I lead a typical white American life. I have no trouble attending a Red Sox
game on Saturday and having fun at the Feast of the Blessed Sacrament on
Sunday (the largest Portuguese festival in the country--US)
I will admit that as a teenager I was embarassed to be Portuguese. This is
not a very loved race in the city I live. But as an adult I rose above the
stereotypes and decided I didn't want to ignore part of my heritage due to
the ignorance of others. I am who I am. I am both ethnic and mainstream.
I don't want to be either extreme.
If someone denies who they really are by masking or hiding their 'ethnic'
identities, I do think it is a self esteem issue. If someone tries to be
all that they can be, retaining, of course, who they are, while 'enhancing'
their life with other experiences..........great!!!
: What does this mean anyway? I see this buzz word phrase (gospel?) "accept
: their/your deafness" and I do not understand it at all.
: Many people who are deaf and sign (signing deaf?) have also taken speech cl
>>> 17 line(s) deleted...
|
