LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Daniel Saffioti <[log in to unmask]>
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 09:51:06 +1000
text/plain (104 lines)
> On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, stan wrote:
>
> > Thanks Daniel and Trish for your interestings ideas regarding subscribing
> > students to their respective Listserv lists. I had not considered just
> > creating one list per course, but its certainly easy enough for me to
> > implement. A couple of issues come to mind about that. How do you name
> > each list?
>
> This may not be something you have control of or input into at the
> administration level.  Fortunately, all of our course names are unique and
> never change, i.e., 4 character subject or department code (EDUC, MATH,
> STATS, CHEM, PSYC, etc.) and all of them have 3 digit course numbers
> assigned (EDUC203, MATH220, etc.) so we are in a position to create a
> mailing list for each class and never delete it unless the dept. tells us
> that the course will never be offered again. This is also how courses are
> identified in the student database, on student registration forms and
> listings in the course calendars.

Yes we are in virtually in the same boat, our list typically have the names
smp_csci204_10122, where csci204 is the subject id and the long integer is
an instance id, as the subject may be on offer at many campuses.

As I said, we trust the corporate database is accurate, and in our case the
association between subject and lectureer has been maintaned so we can
assign the moderator as we build them.

>
> > <....> We
> > do not track instructors' email addresses so I cannot automatically assign
> > ownership of each list to the appropriate instructor so I am thinking of
> > assigning ownership of each of these lists to both the manager of our
> > computer services help desk AND the general helpdesk email address.
>
> I wanted to avoid this if at all possible so I didn't go that route,
> though we certainly could have and I'm sure it would have worked just
> fine. We had a policy in effect, even if it was a faculty member teaching
> a class, that they were responsible for the day to day management of the
> list. We just extended the policy and said "If you want a list, it belongs
> to you or your dept. and we do not want or have the authority to change
> list owners on your lists".  We encouraged depts with large numbers of
> mailing lists to designate a class list co-ordinator who, when completing
> the form for a new mailing list, would automatically have quiet list owner
> status on the list.  When a faculty member in a new term says "I'm
> teaching MATH 334, but I don't have access to MATH334-L", we refer them to
> the class list co-ordinator in the Math & Stats Dept.
>

I would like to have done ours like that however what we have done is
similar. Again our corporate database stores the owner of the list. We give the
faculty administrative assistants the ability to ammend the database data,
so they can add multiple people to a subject, who would ultimatly be
responsible for moderation.

> > What I would also like to do is set up a separate subdirectory under
> > ~listserv/home for each semester, such as fall2000, summer1, spring2001,
> > and so on and keep the list's and their archived postings in those directores
> > so that I can easily archive and delete them at the end of each semester.
>
> I ran into a similar problem because Listserv does not permit multiple
> directories for the web archives so I couldn't keep the courses together
> as I could the ones without archives.  However, I keep a single file that
> lists the listnames of all class mailing lists and run a script to delete
> all archives of those mailing lists.  I also have a web form so that the
> instructor can do it as well, whenever they want.  Because instructors use
> a web form to update/add their own students automatically, there was no
> need to separate mailing lists into fall200, summer1, etc.  They use the
> same list header as a previous instructor and alter it depending on how
> they want to run their list when they teach the course.  When they add a
> new set of students for a new Term, the old list of students is
> automatically removed/deleted at that time.
>

We don't permit archived posting yet, I suspect it will be coming though.

> > <...> I figure its easier (and cheaper on
> > disk space) to just delete each semester's set of course related lists and
> > create new ones starting a few days prior to the start of the comining
> > semester. Does this sound reasonable?
>
> If the deletion of lists and archives and the creation of new lists is
> automated, it is reasonable. :-)  I would be doing the same thing if I had
> assumed responsibility for changing list owners on course mailing lists.
>
> I know I have made it sound like the concept of a "class mailing list
> co-ordinator"  dumps most of the responsibility and work onto
> faculty/depts leaving me and our helpdesk free to do other things.
> However, from a customer service perspective, it has really turned out to
> be a benefit for everyone: 1. class list co-ordinators (or course
> administrators as some like to call themselves) actually like having the
> control over their dept mailing lists (empowerment) and of course they
> like the title, 2. It also puts the entire class mailing list process,
> including any decisions, closer to the customer, i.e., in the individual
> depts.  I'm confident that if I were to do what you are planning, I would
> get a fight for control.  People grumble when you give them
> responsibility, control and authority and they also grumble if you try to
> take it away. ;-)
>
> Sorry this is so long. I hope the information is of some use.
>
> --Trish
>

Daniel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2