Fri, 4 Oct 1991 13:46:23 PDT
|
On Fri, 4 Oct 1991 21:14:29 +0100 Eric Thomas said:
>On Fri, 4 Oct 1991 12:49:50 PDT RIEHL@USCVM said:
>
>>postmast@uscvm post master
>
>Somehow, this line gives me the feeling you are maintaining this list as
>a free text file on LISTSERV 191, using XEDIT. This may work, but is not
>supported. Many things may fail due to that.
no. i do not do that. I subscribed to the list to monitor initial
activity.
>>1. i changed the send field from 'private' to 'editor,owner' (yes, i
>> know its redundant). for the next half hour, anyone on the list was
>> still able to post to the list. What is the delay caused by?
>
>No idea. If the cache data is older than the time stamp of the LIST file,
>it is rebuilt. SENDFILE plays with time stamps under the assumption that
>everyone bothers to set his GMT offset properly, which is almost never
>the case, so if this is the way you maintain the list it could be the
>reason.
>
it was the CACHE file. i made another update, and erased the cache file.
it worked immediately
>>2. I would like to have postings to the list by subscribers forwarded to
>> the list editor. from the mailform, this looks possible because of
>> the presence of a message. How do i do this?
>
>This should happen the way it is set up now.
>
this was another delay from the cache file. the test userid was getting
rejected. he had only just subscribed moments before.
thanks to eric thomas & bob kaneshige
jr
|
|
|