A new PEERS NAMES was distributed, with the Fixed-80 problem solved, thanks
to Eric, and this time, fewer sites have rejected it. If the below sites
have no intention of signing the EARN contract, thus allowing me to update
their tables, please drop me a note so I don't send the update to your site
at all, and save some links from burden.
 
Status on LISTEARN sites: GREARN, DHDURZ1, NOBIVM, BLEKUL11, FRMOP11,
 HASARA11, DCZTU1, ICNUCEVM, NEUVM1, TECHNION have signed the contract.
 
Here are the replies:
 
(Germany)
From:         Revised List Processor (1.5o) <LISTSERV@FRULM11>
From:         Revised List Processor (1.5o) <LISTSERV@FRMOP11>
From:         Revised List Processor (1.5o) <LISTSERV@FRECP11>
(Finland)
From:         Revised List Processor (1.5o) <LISTSERV@CERNVM>
(Belgium)
From:         Revised List Processor (1.5o) <LISTSERV@LEPICS>
From:         Revised List Processor (1.5n) <LISTSERV@FRSAC12>
(Florida)
From:         Revised List Processor (1.6c) <LISTSERV@ESOC>
(France)
From:         Revised List Processor (1.6c) <LISTSERV@BNANDP11>
(Switzerland)
From:         Revised List Processor (1.5o) <LISTSERV@FINHUTC>
(Germany)
From:         Revised List Processor (1.5o) <LISTSERV@DB0TUI11>
From:         Revised List Processor (1.6c) <LISTSERV@DB0FUB11>
 
Subject:      Command: PUT PEERS NAMES CONTROL
To:           [log in to unmask]
 
You are not authorized to store file "PEERS NAMES".
 
(I got a lot of msgs stating the correct location of ESOC for my previous
mailing - consider this as my rejection mail :)                   -turgut