Eric Thomas <ERIC@FRECP11>
Wed, 28 Jan 1987 20:04 SET
|
Don't panic, the NIC did not disable the DISTRIBUTE function. However their
server has a very old version of PEERS NAMES which does NOT list the BITNIC
server (it appears as NEWLIST@BITNIC). When a server finds itself unable to
locate its own darn entry in PEERS NAMES, it assumes that the other servers do
not know about it either (quite reasonable I think). There can be two reasons:
1) The PEERS NAMES file is too old. Anyway the other servers would reject any
inter-server DISTRIBUTE command for security reasons since they don't know
about it. That's like MAILER checking the RSCS tag to validate the origin.
2) The site has erased PEERS NAMES because the server is local-only. That's
how I had first implemented the "DISTRIBUTE command lockout" feature. The
normal way to disable it now is to change your :release entry from 1.nn to
01.nn or 1.0nn (ie anything that will be considered < 1.4 by REXX). Yet the
old way still works.
All of this will be fixed when a new copy of PEERS NAMES has been received at
BITNIC and CUNYVM. I sent a recent version to Ricky on the day the problem
occured but the lines seem to have been down for a while -- I'm just getting
plenty of mail from the US right now. Maybe it's fixed by the time you receive
this but I wanted to explain the cause of the problem.
Eric
|
|
|