On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:15:58 EDT, Karl Signell <[log in to unmask]>  said:
> Any explanation for why this message ended up in the bit bucket?  There's

Yep, there is. ;)

> >Received: from mail2.fcgnetworks.net (mail2.fcgnetworks.net [208.210.86.12])
> >         by cpcug.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA11961
> >         for <[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:41:10 -0400 (EDT)

You're running 8.9.3.  Good.  Latest is 8.11.4, but 8.9.3 is still OK.

Checking in your Sendmail logs (you DO Keep them, right?) for the string
'JAA11961' should reveal what address(es) it was sent to.

> >Received: from smtp.fcgnetworks.net (man6-pool-12.fcgnetworks.net
> >[208.210.87.76])

Hmm... a probable dialup that announces its hostname as smtp.  Funky. ;)

> >         by mail2.fcgnetworks.net (8.9.2/8.9.0) with SMTP id JAA14679;
> >         Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:40:52 -0400 (EDT)

They however are running an old copy that's spammable/relayable.

But that's besides the point here - I don't think it was intentional spam.

> >Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:40:52 -0400 (EDT)
> >Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
> >FROM: Open Arms Outreach <[log in to unmask]>

> >SUBJECT: to be accepted.  Color
> >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >X-Priority: 3
> >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >To: undisclosed-recipients:;

And this is the offending line.  Listserv doesn't enjoy RFC822 'list;' syntax.

Hopefully your Sendmail logs recorded the 'RCPT TO:' values, which may give
you more insight on the who/why.  Let me know if you need more help...

/Valdis